The Most Common Mistakes in IT Projects and How to Avoid Them
IT project: a new system, fresh enthusiasm, ambitious goals. The team meets at the kick-off, the schedule is approved, and the plan predicts only success. But then, with each passing week, something starts to go wrong. Tasks wait for decisions, deadlines shrink, and in Excel, a parallel world emerges. Sounds familiar? Not just to you. Statistics indicate that more than half of IT projects are delayed or over budget.
Interestingly, technology is rarely to blame. It is better to learn the most common mistakes in IT projects and ways to avoid them, because it is how we run IT project management that determines success or failure.
1. Unclear roles and responsibilities in IT projects
One of the most insidious mistakes in IT projects always appears when the team finishes a sprint, and no one knows who should say, “ok, we’re closing this topic.” It seems like it will resolve itself, but in reality, the project stalls.
Why is this dangerous?
- Every day without decisions is a real cost to the team and the company—wasting hours blocks the entire delivery chain.
- A lack of clearly defined roles creates internal tension, frustration, and clashes that can escalate into more serious conflicts.
How to avoid it:
- RACI matrix – not just a formality but a practical competency map for the team. It clearly defines who is responsible for completing a task (R), who makes the decision (A), who provides input (C), and who must be informed (I).
- Role workshop at the start – before you throw everyone into a common Slack or Teams channel, hold a short workshop where each participant describes their role in their own words. Differences become clear very quickly and can be fixed before they grow into bigger issues.
- Backup plan – projects end, but vacations and sick leaves happen. If a key person is unavailable, the project can’t wait. It’s worth assigning an official “decision backup.”
Remember:
Clear roles and decision paths are like the drive shafts of the entire IT project—without them, even the best system won’t move forward.
2. Blind faith in documentation – ignoring real processes
Sometimes documentation is created even before actual processes are examined. We reproduce what “seems to work,” ignore exceptions, and then, during a workshop, discover that each department understands the same process completely differently.
Why is this dangerous?
- The developed IT system will formally meet requirements, but may not solve any real problems.
- Costs of fixes grow exponentially—the later gaps are discovered, the more expensive the repairs.
How to avoid it:
- Process workshops with users – mapping processes “live” exposes areas skipped in documentation.
- Living documentation – requirements published and discussed in Confluence, Notion, or Jira, evolving with the project.
- Regular refresh meetings with the business team . As requirements change, people must stay up to date.
Remember:
IT documentation is a roadmap, not an oracle. The real challenges occur only when an IT project gets into the user’s daily work.
3. Unrealistic scope and lack of priorities
Many IT projects can’t be delivered “all at once.” A scope too large dilutes focus, drains the team’s energy, and leads to the trap of endless work.
Why is this dangerous?
- Priority functions may get lost among “nice-to-have” additions.
- Sprints turn into constant rescheduling; frustration grows due to a lack of results.
How to avoid it:
- MoSCoW method – dividing functions into “must have,” “should have,” “could have,” and “won’t have.”
- MVP and phased implementation – create a minimum version, test it, then expand in stages.
- Time and budget buffers – included right at the planning stage.
Remember:
Not everything has to be done now. It’s better to deliver less but well than try to do everything and lose control.
4. Jumping to solutions without understanding needs
Sometimes clients request: “Please make me a table like in Excel, only in the new system.” Asking “why?” often reveals that the real issue isn’t the table but the need for quick data analysis.
Why is this dangerous?
- Reinforcing old, ineffective habits in a new system.
- Disappointment right after implementation—“It was supposed to be better.”
How to avoid it:
- Technika 5 Whys 5 Whys technique – ask “why?” multiple times until you get to the true business goal.
- Requirements analysis based on user needs, not just functions.
- User testing occurs at the stages of mockup and user story.
Remember:
An IT system should solve a business problem, not just replicate old patterns.
5. Lack of partnership communication and empathy
Avoiding difficult conversations, sweeping tensions under the rug… The team and the client stop feeling like partners, seeing each other instead as “the other side.”
Why is this dangerous?
- Unspoken tensions build up and explode when it’s too late.
- Instead of cooperation, a hidden fight for self-interest emerges.
How to avoid it:
- Retrospectives and informal check-ins – space for conversations, not just status updates.
- No-blame culture and openly communicating concerns.
- The meeting facilitator ensures all voices are heard.
Remember:
In an IT project, there are no “others”—success or failure is the sum of everyone’s engagement.
6. Bottlenecks and dependence on single individuals
A common issue: everything depends on one integration, one person, one team. When delays or vacations occur, the project comes to a stop.
Why is this dangerous?
- Costs increase as the team waits unproductively.
- Decisions pile up, and problems compound rapidly.
How to avoid it:
- Dependency and bottleneck mappingduring planning.
- Backup resources, alternative decision paths, and up-to-date process documentation.
- Proactive workload monitoring – Kanban boards make it immediately clear where the flow is blocked.
Remember:
Bottlenecks won’t solve themselves—you need to predict and resolve them before they delay your project.
7. Team overload and burnout
The initial enthusiasm fades quickly when the project adds tasks to the team’s daily workload. Morale drops, and people start counting the days until the end… or until they find a new job.
Why is this dangerous?
- More errors, more fixes, longer implementation time.
- Risk of key staff turnover.
How to avoid it:
- Realistic capacity planning – assigning tasks based on actual availability.
- 70/30 rule – no one should be dedicated 100% to a project.
- <strong<Quick mood surveys– simple tools to catch “hard emotions” before they turn into burnout.
Taking care of the team’s well-being brings measurable business results—better quality and faster delivery.
In conclusion, avoiding the most common mistakes in IT projects comes down to anticipation and response. Clear roles, realistic scope, openness, requirement analysis, partnership communication, and care for the team form the foundations of effective IT project management.
Planning an implementation, noticing early challenges, or facing classic project problems?
Contact Finture today to discuss your project needs. Let’s work together to avoid common pitfalls and achieve effective IT project management—reach out now to get started.
The administrator of the data entered in the form is Finture Ltd. Personal data will be processed to establish contact and answer questions. More information about your rights and data processing rules is available in the privacy policy.
